Worlds tech elite oppose removing extremist posts

binary options 101 The world’s largest tech companies are opposing the removal of extremist posts claiming its risk to freedom of speech, insisting Governments seeking tech companies to restrict content should be consistent with existing legal frameworks.

binäre optionen mit etoro The Global Network Initiative (GNI) compromised of technology companies such as Microsoft Corp, Alphabet Inc’s Google, Facebook Inc, LinkedIn Corp and Yahoo! Inc, and civil society groups and academics believe such censorship risks freedom of speech, a right that the UN believe all should be entitled.

scommettere in azioni binarie In a policy brief in which GNI members have been developing since 2015 comes amidst increasing calls from governments to monitor or restrict access to online content on the grounds “that it allegedly radicalizes individuals, supports terrorist organizations, or encourages violence or terrorist acts.”

migliore piattaforma per treding binario However, the GNI recommended that governments and companies protect free speech and privacy when challenged with alleged extremist or terrorist content online, and to be transparent in their processes regarding content restriction.

notizie in tempo reale sul forexTechnology companies have a role to play in addressing national security concerns, but the pressure to censor raises serious human rights risks,” says GNI Independent Board Chair Mark Stephens, CBE. “Anti-terrorist laws have been used to silence, harass and imprison individuals around the world, including dissidents, journalists, writers, human rights defenders and ordinary citizens expressing their views on social media.”  

Reliable work from home positions While most people automatically assume terrorist activities to be of Islamist origin, protests at Standing Rock, Human rights activities or Animal right activities could also fall under the banner of “extremist” or “terrorist” content. trader profittevole binarie eur usd As a result, GNI has recommended that Governments :

  • Laws and policies must distinguish between messages that aim to incite terrorist acts and those that discuss, debate or report on them.
  • Journalists and media outlets must not be penalized for reporting or providing commentary about terrorist groups, or for informing the public about acts of terrorism.
  • Governments must not compel speech or dissemination of speech by private actors as part of their efforts to protect national security or public order.
  • Governments should not prohibit the use of encryption technologies, compel the weakening of security systems, nor seek to subvert digital security standards in other ways. Such technologies preserve speakers’ abilities to communicate alternative messages.

binär optionen versteuern You can read the full policy brief here


realtime trades a comments

Charis McAwesome

come si impara a giocare in borsa Charis McAwesome is a social media client project manager to companies including Microsoft, Intel, Lenovo, Deloitte, banks and many more on behalf of Digivizer. By day, she provides digital strategy and big data analysis, by night she may provide news on the podcast & when she doesn't, makes up for it by writing articles instead.